References

Adamiak Z, Holak P, Piórek A. Thoracoscopic biopsy of lung tumors using a Roeder's loop in dogs. Pol J Vet Sci.. 2008; 11:(1)75-7

Balsa IM, Culp WTN. Use of Minimally Invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer in dogs and cats. Vet Sci.. 2019; 6:(1) https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fvetsci6010033

Barry KS, Case JB, Winter MD, Garcia-Pereira FL, Buckley G, Johnson MD. Diagnostic usefulness of laparoscopy versus exploratory laparotomy for dogs with suspected gastrointestinal obstruction. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2017; 251:(3)307-314 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.251.3.307

Brisson BA, Reggeti F, Bienzle D. Portal site metastasis of invasive mesothelioma after diagnostic thoracoscopy in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2009; 229:(6)980-3 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.229.6.980

Brückner M, Heblinski N, Henrich M. Use of a novel vessel-sealing device for peripheral lung biopsy and lung lobectomy in a cadaveric model. J Small Anim Pract. 2019; 60:(7)411-416 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12985

Ballegeer EA, Forrest LJ, Dickinson RM, Schutten MM, Delaney FA, Young KM. Correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of lesions and cytologic and histologic diagnoses in splenic aspirates from dogs and cats: 32 cases (2002-2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2007; 230:(5)690-6 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.230.5.690

Buote NJ, Kovak-McClaran JR, Schold JD. Conversion from diagnostic laparoscopy to laparotomy: risk factors and occurrence. Vet Surg. 2011; 40:106-114 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2010.00759.x

Cosford KL, Shmon CL, Myers SL, Taylor SM, Carr AP, Steiner JM, Suchodolski JS, Mantovani F. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic pancreatic biopsies in 11 healthy cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2010; 24:(1)104-13 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0420.x

Culp WT, Mayhew PD, Brown DC. The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs. Vet Surg. 2009; 38:811-817 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2009.00572.x

Davidson EB, Moll HD, Payton ME. Comparison of laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy and ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet Surg. 2004; 33:(1)62-69 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2004.04003.x

Devitt CM, Cox RE, Hailey JJ. Duration, complications, stress, and pain of open ovariohysterectomy versus a simple method of laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2005; 227:921-927 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.227.921

Fernandez N, Del-Pozo J, Shaw D, Marques AIC. Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques for liver biopsy collection in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2017; 58:(10)555-561 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12708

Freeman LJ. Gastrointestinal laparoscopy in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2019; 39:(5)903-924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.05.002

Hancock RB, Lanz OI, Waldron DR, Duncan RB, Broadstone RV, Hendrix PK. Comparison of postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy by harmonic scalpelassisted laparoscopy compared with median celiotomy and ligation in dogs. Vet Surg. 2005; 34:273-282 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2005.00041.x

Kemp SD, Zimmerman KL, Panciera DL, Monroe WE, Leib MS, Lanz OI. A comparison of liver sampling techniques in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2015; 29:(1)51-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12508

Kim HW, Oh YI, Choi JH, Kim DY, Youn HY. Use of laparoscopy for diagnosing experimentally induced acute pancreatitis in dogs. J Vet Sci.. 2014; 15:(4)551-6 https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.4.551

Kimbrell TL, Milovancev M, Olsen R, Löhr CV. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic 3 mm and 5 mm cup biopsies to wedge biopsies of canine livers. J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32:(2)701-706 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fjvim.15054

Lansdowne JL, Mehler SJ, Boure LP. Minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery: principles and instrumentation. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2012a; 34:E1-9

Lansdowne JL, Mehler SJ, Boure LP. Minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery: techniques. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2012b; 34:E1-E11

Lim H, Kim J, Li L, Lee A, Jeong J, Ko J, Lee S, Kweon OK, Kim WH. Bilateral medial iliac lymph node excision by a ventral laparoscopic approach: technique description. J Vet Med Sci.. 2017; 79:(9)1603-1610 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0627

Marvel S, Monnet E. Ex vivo evaluation of canine lung biopsy techniques. Vet Surg. 2013; 42:(4)473-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2013.01108.x

Maurin MP, Mullins RA, Singh A, Mayhew PD. A systematic review of complications related to laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted procedures in dogs. Vet Surg. 2020; 49:O5-O14 https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13419

McClaran JK, Buote NJ. Complications and need for conversion to laparotomy in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009; 39:941-951 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.05.003

McDevitt HL, Mayhew PD, Giuffrida MA, Brown DC, Culp WT, Runge JJ. Short-term clinical outcome of laparoscopic liver biopsy in dogs: 106 cases (2003-2013). J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2016; 248:(1)83-90 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.248.1.83

Mayhew P. Surgical views: techniques for laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted biopsy of abdominal organs. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2009; 31:(4)170-6

Mayhew P. Developing minimally invasive surgery in companion animals. Vet Rec.. 2011a; 169:177-178 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d5125

Mayhew PD. Complications of minimally invasive surgery in companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011b; 41:1007-1021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.05.008

Mayhew PD, Culp WT, Pascoe PJ, Arzi NV. Use of the Ligasure vessel-sealing device for thoracoscopic peripheral lung biopsy in healthy dogs. Vet Surg. 2012; 41:(4)523-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2011.00984.x

Monnet E. Interventional thoracoscopy in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009; 39:(5)965-975 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.05.005

Monnet E. Laparoscopic entry techniques: What is the controversy?. Vet Surg. 2019; 48:O6-O14 https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13220

Monnet E, Twedt DC. Laparoscopy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003; 33:1147-1163 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-5616(03)00058-5

Nowicki M, Rychlik A, Nieradka R, Kander M, Depta A, Chrzastowska M. Usefulness of laparoscopy guided renal biopsy in dogs. Pol J Vet Sci.. 2010; 13:363-371

Oviedo-Peñata CA, Tapia-Araya AE, Lemos JD Validation of training and acquisition of surgical skills in veterinary laparoscopic surgery: a review. Front Vet Sci.. 2020; 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00306

Park J, Lee J, Lee HB, Jeong SM. Laparoscopic kidney biopsy in dogs: Comparison of cup forceps and core needle biopsy. Vet Surg. 2017; 46:(2)226-232 https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12598

Petre SL, McClaran JK, Bergman PJ, Monette S. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatic biopsy in dogs: 80 cases (2004-2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2012; 240:181-185

Radhakrishnan A, Mayhew PD. Laparoscopic splenic biopsy in dogs and cats: 15 cases (2006-2008). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc.. 2013; 49:41-45 https://doi.org/10.5326/jaaha-ms-5823

Rawlings CA, Howerth EW, Bement S, Canalis C. Laparoscopic-assisted enterostomy tube placement and full-thickness biopsy of the jejunum with serosal patching in dogs. Am J Vet Res.. 2002; 63:(9)1313-9 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1313

Rawlings CA, Diamond H, Howerth EW, Neuwirth L, Canalis C. Diagnostic quality of percutaneous kidney biopsy specimens obtained with laparoscopy versus ultrasound guidance in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2003; 223:(3)317-21 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.317

Richter KP. Laparoscopy in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2001; 31:(4)707-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-5616(01)50067-4

Rothuizen J, Twedt DC. Liver biopsy techniques. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009; 39:(3)469-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.02.006

Schmiedt C. Small animal exploratory thoracoscopy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009; 39:(5)953-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.05.007

Shamir SK, Singh A, Mayhew PD Evaluation of minimally invasive small intestinal exploration and targeted abdominal organ biopsy with use of a wound retraction device in dogs: 27 cases (2010-2017). J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2019; 255:(1)78-84 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.255.1.78

Steffey MA, Daniel L, Mayhew PD, Affolter VK, Soares JH, Smith A. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Extirpation of the Tracheobronchial Lymph Nodes in Dogs. Vet Surg. 2015; 44:50-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2014.12204.x

Tapia-Araya AE, Díaz-Güemes Martin-Portugués I, Sánchez-Margallo FM. Veterinary laparoscopy and minimally invasive surgery. Companion Animal.. 2015; 20:(7)382-392

Vaden SL. Renal biopsy of dogs and cats. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2005; 2011-22 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctsap.2004.12.003

Webb CB, Trott C. Laparoscopic diagnosis of pancreatic disease in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2008; 22:1263-1266 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0176.x

Wildt DE, Lawler DF. Laparoscopic sterilization of the bitch and queen by uterine horn occlusion. Am J Vet Res.. 1985; 46:864-869

Minimally invasive laparoscopic methods of biopsy in small animal practice

02 April 2023
11 mins read
Volume 28 · Issue 4
Figure 1. Example of several experts evaluating the area to be biopsied at the same time.
Figure 1. Example of several experts evaluating the area to be biopsied at the same time.

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has benefitted from many technical advances, achieving better results and reduced complications in comparison to conventional surgical techniques. Specialist equipment has been developed to better aid the minimally invasive approach, allowing for more precision, becoming a method of choice for biopsy. It is of particular value in patients where the sites are small or present in locations unsuitable for image-guided biopsy, or where adequate tissue cannot be obtained by image-guided biopsy. Laparoscopy has been proven to offer several benefits to the patient both intraoperatively and postoperatively, therefore, it can be said that laparoscopy provides a safe and effective means of obtaining biopsies in small animal practice.

Laparoscopic surgery, also commonly referred to as minimally invasive surgery or ‘key-hole’ surgery, has been one of the fastest growing methods of modern surgery. In the last 10 years, it has awakened great interest among veterinarians owing to the reported advantages for patients; including, but not limited to, minimised surgical trauma, real therapeutic safety and faster recovery (Devitt et al, 2005; Culp et al, 2009). The modern age of laparoscopy in human medicine boomed in the late 1980s, although in veterinary medicine, the same paradigm shift to the minimally invasive approach in soft tissue surgery has yet to occur (Wildt and Lawler, 1985). Some evidence exists in veterinary patients to support the hypothesis that approaches like laparoscopy decrease the severity or incidence of surgical morbidities compared to open surgery (Davidson et al, 2004; Hancock et al, 2005). However, in veterinary medicine, the field of laparoscopy is still very much in its infancy, and further evidence-based randomised studies are required (Mayhew, 2011a).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.