References

Armbrust LJ, Biller DS, Bamford A Comparison of three-view thoracic radiography and computed tomography for detection of pulmonary nodules in dogs with neoplasia. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012; 240:(9)1088-1094 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.240.9.1088

Barnes DC, Demetriou JL. Surgical management of primary, metastatic and recurrent anal sac adenocarcinoma in the dog: 52 cases: Repeat metastatectomy for anal sac adenocarcinoma. J Small Anim Pract. 2017; 58:(5)263-268 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12633

Bennett PF, DeNicola DB, Bonney P, Glickman NW, Knapp DW. Canine anal sac adenocarcinomas: clinical presentation and response to therapy. J Vet Internal Med. 2002; 16:(1)100-104 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb01613.x

Bowlt KL, Friend EJ, Delisser P Temporally separated bilateral anal sac gland carcinomas in four dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2013; 54:(8)432-436 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12077

Chambers AR, Skinner OT, Mickelson MA Adherence to follow-up recommendations for dogs with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Vet Comp Oncol. 2020; 18:(4)683-688 https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12597

Elliott JH. Response and outcome following toceranib phosphate treatment for stage four anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinoma in dogs: 15 cases (2013-2017). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019; 254:(8)960-966 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.254.8.960

Emms SG. Anal sac tumours of the dog and their response to cytoreduction surgery and chemotherapy. Australian Vet J. 2005; 83:(6)340-343 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb15626.x

Goldschmidt MH, Hendrick MJ. Tumours of the skin and soft tissues, 4th edn. In: Meuten DJ (ed). Ames: Iowa State Press;

Hammer AS, Couto CG, Ayl RD, Shank KA. Treatment of tumour-bearing dogs with actinomycin D. J Vet Int Med. 1994; 8:(3)236-239 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1994.tb03224.x

Heaton CM, Fernandes AFA, Jark PC Evaluation of toceranib for treatment of apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2020; 34:(2)873-881 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15706

Hobson HP, Brown MR, Rogers KS. Surgery of metastatic anal sac adenocarcinoma in five dogs. Vet Surg. 2006; 35:(3)267-270 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00137.x

Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signalling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2010; 141:(7)1117-1134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011

Liptak JM, Turek MM. Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, 6th ed. In: Vail DM, Thamm DH, Liptak JM (eds). St. Louis: Elsevier; 2020

Meier V, Polton G, Cancedda S Outcome in dogs with advanced (stage 3b) anal sac gland carcinoma a treated with surgery or hypofractionated radiation therapy. Vet Comp Oncol. 2017; 15:(3)1073-1086 https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12248

Meuten DJ, Cooper BJ, Capen CC, Chew DJ, Kocib GJ. Hypercalcaemia associated with an adenocarcinoma derived from the apocrine glands of the anal sac. Vet Pathol. 1981; 18:(4)454-471 https://doi.org/10.1177/030098588101800405

Evaluation of radiographs for detection of sublumbar lymphadenopathy in dogs. 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296867/

Palladino S, Keyerleber MA, King RG Utility of computed tomography versus abdominal ultrasound examination to identify iliosacral lymphadenomegaly in dogs with apocrine gland adenocarcinoma of the anal sac. J Vet Intern Med. 2016; 30:(6)1858-1863 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14601

Polton GA, Brearley MJ. Clinical stage, therapy, and prognosis in canine anal sac gland carcinoma. J Vet Internal Med. 2007; 21:(2)274-280 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb02960.x

Polton GA, Mowat V, Lee HC Breed, gender and neutering status of British dogs with anal sac gland carcinoma. Vet Comparative Oncol. 2006; 4:(3)125-131 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5829.2006.00100.x

Radlinsky MG. Surgery of the digestive system, 4th edn. In: Fossum T.W. (ed). St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013

Ross JT, Scavelli TD, Matthiesen DT, Patnaik AK Adenocarcinoma of the apocrine glands of the anal sac in dogs: a review of 32 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991; 223:(6)825-831

Simeonov RS. The accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of canine skin and subcutaneous masses. Comp Clin Pathol. 2012; 21:(2)143-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-010-1075-5

Tanis JB, Simlett-Moss AB, Ossowksa M Canine anal sac gland carcinoma with regional lymph node metastases treated with sacculectomy and lymphadenectomy: Outcome and possible prognostic factors. Vet Comparative Oncol. 2022; 276-292

Turek MM, Forrest LJ, Adams WM, Helfand SC, Vail DM. Postoperative radiotherapy and mitoxantrone for anal sac adenocarcinoma in dog: 15 cases (1991–2001). Vet Comp Oncol. 2003; 1:(2)94-104 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1476-5829.2003.00013.x

Unterer S. Rectoanal disease, 8th edn. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, Cote E (ed). St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017

Williams LE, Gliatto JM, Dodge RK Carcinoma of the apocrine glands of the anal sac in dogs: 113 cases (1985–1995). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003; 223:(6)825-831 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.825

Wouda RM, Borrego J, Keuler NS Evaluation of adjuvant carboplatin chemotherapy in the management of surgically excised anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinoma in dogs: adjuvant carboplatin chemotherapy for canine ASAGAC. Vet Comp Oncol. 2016; 14:(1)67-80 https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12068

Zoetis. Palladia Treatment Information for Dog Owners. 2015. https://www.zoetisus.com/products/dogs/palladia/pdf/palladia_client_form_customizable.pdf (Accessed 11 May 2022)

Managing canine apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma

02 August 2022
11 mins read
Volume 27 · Issue 8
Figure 5. Transverse computed tomography projection showing a heterogeneous contrast-enhancing markedly enlarged metastatic sub-lumbar lymph node (red star)
Figure 5. Transverse computed tomography projection showing a heterogeneous contrast-enhancing markedly enlarged metastatic sub-lumbar lymph node (red star)

Abstract

Canine apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma represents a common challenge for veterinary practitioners. This is often partly because the majority of animals diagnosed with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma show no systemic signs at the time of presentation. Moreover, rectal examinations are not frequently performed during routine physical examinations, making it difficult to diagnose a mass at an early stage. An understanding of the disease process, common metastatic sites, diagnostic modalities and multimodal treatment approaches will help practitioners achieve better clinical outcomes for animals diagnosed with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, knowledge of prognostic indicators will help practitioners to set realistic expectations with their clients and improve clinician–client communication. This article focuses on the predisposition, staging, multimodal treatment therapies and outcomes of dogs presenting with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma.

Apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma (AGASAC) represents 17% of perianal tumours and 2% of all cutaneous tumours in dogs (Liptak and Turek, 2020). This tumour arises from the apocrine secretory epithelium in the anal sac gland wall (Goldschmidt and Hendrick, 2002). It is characterised by high local invasiveness and a high metastatic rate (Polton and Brearley, 2007). Furthermore, the tumour can be associated with hypercalcaemia of malignancy that causes an additional clinical challenge (Williams et al, 2003). The majority are diagnosed at a late stage, when the tumour is large and early metastasis is already established. A multimodal approach to AGASAC, including early diagnosis, surgical management, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is associated with increased median survival time (Williams et al, 2003).

English Cocker Spaniels, Labradors and German Shepherds, followed by Cavalier King Charles Spaniels, were over-represented in a study of British dogs with AGASAC (Polton et al, 2006). Among those breeds, English Cocker Spaniels are reported to be genetically predisposed to AGASAC and have a mean relative risk of 7.3 compared to other breeds (Polton et al, 2006). The tumour tends to affect dogs in middle-to-old age, with 10 years being the median age at presentation. The risk of neoplasia increases in neutered dogs, especially neutered males (Polton et al, 2006). However, an approximately equal gender distribution has also been reported (Williams et al, 2003).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.