References

Abramowitz HB, Butcher HR Everting and inverting anastomoses: an experimental study of comparative safety. Am J Surg.. 1971; 121:(1)52-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(71)90077-8

Braga M. Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves oxygenation and reduces costs compares with total parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr.. 2001; 29:242-248

Chu KL, Duffy DJ, Vieson MD, Moore GE. Ex vivo comparison of leakage pressures and leakage location with a novel technique for creation of functional side-toside canine small intestinal anastomoses. Vet Surg.. 2020; 49:(5)1024-1011 https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13408

Davis DJ, Demianiuk RM, Musser J, Podsiedlik M, Hauptman J. Influence of preoperative septic peritonitis and anastomotic technique on the dehiscence of enterectomy sites in dogs: a retrospective review of 210 anastomoses. Vet Surg.. 2018; 47:(1)125-129 https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12704

Ellison GW, Jokinen MP, Park RD. End to end approximating anastomosis in the dog: a comparative fluorescein dye, angiographic and histopathologic evaluation. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc.. 1982; 18:(4)729-736

Halstead WS. Circular suture of the intestine: an experimental study. Am J Med Sci.. 1887; 94:436-461

Hansen LA, Monnet EL. Evaluation of serosal patch supplementation of surgical anastomoses in intestinal segments from canine cadavers. Am J Vet Res.. 2013; 74:(8)1138-1141 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.8.1138

Jansen A, Becker AE, Brummelkamp WH, Keeman JN, Klopper PJ. The importance of the apposition of the submucosal intestinal layers for primary wound healing of intestinal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981; 152:(1)51-58

Kirpensteijn J, Maarschalkerweerd RJ, van der Gaag I, Kooistra HS, van Sluijs FJ. Comparison of three closure methods and two absorbable suture materials for closure of jejunal enterotomy incisions in healthy dogs. Vet Q. 2001; 23:(2)67-70 https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2001.9695084

Loeb MJ. Comparative strength of inverted, everted, and end-on intestinal anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967; 125:301-304

McCagherty J, Yool DA, Paterson GK Investigation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of triclosan-coated suture material on bacteria commonly isolated from wounds in dogs. Am J Vet Res.. 2020; 81:(1)84-90 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.81.1.84

McLackin AD, Denton DW. Omental protection of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg.. 1973; 125:(1)134-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(73)90018-4

Saile K, Boothe HW, Boothe DM. Saline volume necessary to achieve predetermined intraluminal pressures during leak testing of small intestinal biopsy sites in the dog. Vet Surg.; 39:(7)900-903 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00730.x

Ullman SL, Pavletic MM, Clark GN. Open intestinal anastomosis with surgical stapling equipment in 24 dogs and cats. Vet Surg.. 1991; 20:(6)385-391 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.1991.tb00344.x

White RN. Modified functional end-to-end stapled intestinal anastomosis: technique and clinical results in 15 dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2008; 49:(6)274-281 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00499.x

A practical review of small intestinal anastomosis for the small animal practitioner

02 January 2021
11 mins read
Volume 26 · Issue 1

Abstract

Dehiscence following intestinal surgery results in significant patient morbidity and mortality. Thorough knowledge and application of modern evidence-based principles relating to the procedures of enterotomy and enterectomy with anastomosis can significantly reduce the risk of postoperative complications in small animals. This article will review some of the potential causes of intestinal dehiscence and reflect on best practice surgical principles, highlighting particularly important key learning objectives to improve outcome.

Small intestinal surgery is commonly performed in first opinion practice. It may be indicated for biopsy, removal of foreign body obstruction or resection of neoplasia, non-viable tissue or irreparable injury. The consequences of postoperative intestinal leakage are significant morbidity and mortality, necessitating revision surgery or euthanasia. Enterotomy (a simple incision into the intestinal lumen) and enterectomy (removal of a length of intestine) followed by anastomosis (re-apposition of the cut gut ends) are the most frequently performed procedures, with enterectomy anastomosis having a reported dehiscence rate between 7 and 16% (and higher if there is pre-existing septic peritonitis).

There are multiple factors that may increase the risk of postoperative leakage and subsequent septic peritonitis. It can be helpful to classify risk into three major groups to identify them logically, help recognise animals at greatest risk of dehiscence and, if possible, address the potential causes (Table 1). This article focuses on practical procedural considerations that are applicable to general practice, and highlights methods of optimising the biological and mechanical environment of the intestinal surgical site for healing.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.